What Path does
An anonymous, aggregate picture of how your people are developing — without putting anyone under surveillance.
For your organisation
Know what your people are developing towards, and where support would help
Whether you’re a university, an NHS trust, a professional body, or a membership scheme, Path gives you an anonymous, aggregate picture of how your people are developing against the standards that matter, so you can put support where it’s needed without putting anyone under surveillance.
Privacy by design
Visibility without surveillance
Your organisation dashboard shows cohort-level data by default — how many members have started a path, what frameworks they’re using, where coverage is strong and where it isn’t. You see patterns, not people.
A person becomes visible by name only when they choose to share a specific path with the organisation, or submit it for review. Until then, Path protects their portfolio as theirs.
What you see by default
- What your people are developing towards, by type
- Framework coverage across the cohort
- CPD hours and evidence quality, aggregate
- Criterion-level coverage across all frameworks
What stays private
- Individual claim content and reflections
- Whose evidence supports which criterion
- Personal profile details
- Everything, until the member chooses to share
Your own standards
Your framework, with your members’ evidence against it
Path doesn’t prescribe what counts as professional development. You define the standards — your CPD criteria, your competency framework, your membership grade requirements — and members gather evidence against them.
The result is an aggregate picture of where your members are building strength against your standards and where they’d benefit from support, by criterion and by evidence strength. You can export it as a Word report for a board or a funder.
You define the criteria
Add your standards, competences, or CPD requirements. Group them into pillars. Describe what evidence counts.
Members evidence against them
Each member builds their own portfolio against your framework — claims, CPD, reflections, evidence — rated by strength.
You see where support would help
Your dashboard shows criterion-by-criterion coverage across your membership, updated as members add evidence.
How the review works
A structured review process, without the friction
- A member submits their path for review when ready. An admin allocates one or more reviewers from the organisation.
- Each reviewer works independently through the criteria — reading the claims and evidence alongside them — leaving feedback and a recommendation.
- Feedback reaches the member alongside their actual work, attributed anonymously to a “Reviewer” — review is blind, and reviewers don't see each other's comments.
- The admin makes the final decision from the reviewers' recommendations and notes. Outside review, they see aggregate progress across the cohort, and a member's path only if that member shares it with the organisation.
Reviewing
A member’s submission
Professional revalidation · you can read the submission but not change it
Audit-led change to follow-up pathway
I led an audit of follow-up appointments, found a gap, and redesigned the pathway — re-audit showed a measurable improvement…
Your organisation
Supporting your people
Where your people are developing, and where they’d benefit from support — aggregate and anonymous, never individual.
42
members with paths
57
paths
3
reviews open
By framework
Your people are already doing the work. Path helps them show what it means, and shows you where they’d benefit from support.
Path is in closed, invite-only testing. Join the list and I’ll be in touch.